Prices have been meandering between 5000 - 5150. The price movements can be labelled in many ways, just a couple of them are shown here. There are a host of support levels between the range of 5050 - 4990. So far as we reverse back up and hold above the lower boundary of this support zone, we are good for a dynamic wave III. Even if we break down from this range, the last hope is 4900, but below this level, I would be skeptical of this expected up move. The STS is oversold, RSI is sporting a positive divergence, MACD may stage a ZLR, but all this is based on the notion that we are going up, its always better to wait for the market to tip its hand and then jump on the train. I suggest waiting for those who are already in at lower levels, and for fresh positions, one can buy in this zone of 5050 - 4990, with 4900 as a SL for positional traders, and 4990 - 80 for short term market timers.
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Nifty - Elliott Wave Analysis
Tags
# Elliott Wave
# Indices
About Dean Market Profile
Dean is a fulltime trader for last 13 years. He is passionate about technical analysis. His instruments of choice are Nifty and banknifty futures and options. His main analysis and trading tools include advanced techniques like Market Profile, Voilume Spread Analysis and Order FLow Analysis. Dean is a teacher at heart and loves sharing his learnings with committed traders. You can check out his courses here...
Nifty
Categories:
Elliott Wave,
Indices,
Nifty
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hi Aniruddha,
ReplyDeleteTaking 5190 as 'b' of "II" would not be logical I think as 5124-5015 = 109 'a'
b = 1.382*109 = 150 points so it comes to 5165..
So I would rather take 5190 as B of the 2nd of "III"
What you think?
That is one my alternate labels, you can see it on the chart with a "?" mark behind the labels. But both the possibilities are equally likely, when wave [a] is sharp, [b] waves can take inordinate time and space, lets see what exactly pans out. The crux of the matter is for short term market timers keeping a small SL is in order. :)
DeleteHI ANIRUDDHA ,
ReplyDeleteONE OF UR COUNT SUGGEST THAT WAVE "b" HAS MORE THAN 138.2% OF "a" THUS WAVE "c" WILL NEVER RETRACE ALL OF "b". AS GNENN NEELY SUGGEST IN HIS BOOK.
SO IT WILL BE ALL TOGETHER A RUNNING CORRECTION & WAVE III WILL BE THEN EXTENDED ONE .THIS SEEMS TO BE LOGICAL COUNT AS TODAY ACTION .
CAN U PLEASE HAVE A OPINION ON MY LOGIC
@Amar Sutar
ReplyDeleteWell I have read glen neely's book. But I prefer the original work of Elliott and the additions done to it by prechter. Such running corrections are rare but not totally ruled out. So I am open for various possibilities and will use my trading plan to trade the markets and my Elliott wave count as a backdrop for my trades.